_MG_8495

Old Dog, New Tricks – Intercooler R&D, Part 3: Flow Bench

Intercooler design is a delicate balance of pressure and flow. Too much flow means that the charge air does not stay in the core long enough to transfer heat. Too little flow, and too much pressure, means all the work your turbo or supercharger has been doing is wasted on forcing the air through the cooler instead of into the cylinders. Heat transfer happens rapidly inside an intercooler, so it’s difficult to make an intercooler core that has good flow. That doesn’t mean we could use just any core in our 2011-2017 6.7L Powerstroke intercooler. Like all our products, this intercooler needed to be extensively tested before it finds its way into our customers’ trucks.

In our last post, we looked at our prototype with its 3D-printed end tanks and aluminum bar core. In this post, we’ll test real cores with production end tanks to get the most accurate results.

_MG_4025

After a few weeks of casting and making small tweaks to the designs of the four end tanks, we had a design that our engineer was happy with. With the end tanks cast, we needed a core to go between them. This is where our testing would become vital. Because this intercooler is an air-to-water cooler, our engineer was essentially developing two cores. Water and air are both considered fluids in physics , but they behave very differently as they move through a space. They also transfer heat differently. This meant that the design for the air side of the core needed to be different than the water side of the core.

The effectiveness of an intercooler core depends on an array of factors. The arrangement of cooling fins, the height of the tubes, core dimensions, and path the fluid takes, all play major roles. For each core, these factors are multiplied by two – once for the fluid to be cooled and once for the fluid receiving that heat.

_MG_5671

In an air-to-air cooler, these two sides can be the same or at least very similar. In an air-to-water cooler, much like a radiator, each must be treated with its specific fluid in mind. Unlike radiator development, this intercooler would require striking that balance of flow and pressure on both sides of the core. For the charge-air side, we turned to our flow bench to find the best flowing core features. We welded our cast end tanks to our core candidates and got to work on the flow bench. After testing multiple variations of fins and tubes, we compared the data between them and the stock cooler.

Before we look at the results, we should talk about how the flow bench works and how flow is calculated. But even before that, we must explain one important concept: pressure is the measure of restriction and flow is the lack of pressure. If you blow into open air, it’s easy and you can flow as much air as your body can produce. If you try to blow through a tiny straw at the same rate, you’ve introduced a restriction in flow and increased the amount of pressure required to flow the same amount of air.

_MG_0710

A flow bench test factors in two main values: pressure and flow rate (measured in cubic-feet per minute, or CFM). Even though we’re looking for the best flowing core, we’re not just looking at the CFM figures. What really matters in flow bench testing is the pressure drop across the part at a pre-set CFM. Inside the flow bench is essentially a powerful vacuum that draws air in at known rates of flow. The machine then measures the amount of pressure needed to pull that much air through the part. With that pressure, we can calculate the pressure drop across the core and thus how restrictive the core is.

A lower drop in pressure across the core indicates that less pressure is needed to move air at that flow-rate. A lower pressure drop, at the same or higher CFM, indicates a freer flowing core. So how did our best core compare to the stock core?

MMINT-F2D-11_FlowBench

At 600 CFM, our best core showed a 22% lower pressure drop than the stock cooler. Put simply, our core flows 22% better than the stock cooler. That extra flow will let your 6.7L Powerstroke pull in more air, inject more fuel, and make more power. With flow bench testing complete, we’ll soon have a production sample to fit in the truck and soon after that a pre-sale so that you can have one in yours too. Keep an eye out for the next update on this project and feel free to let us know what you think.

Thanks for reading!
-Steve

8 thoughts on “Old Dog, New Tricks – Intercooler R&D, Part 3: Flow Bench”

  1. Called last week to inquire about this project and was told it had been canceled. Is it still happening? If so is there an expected release date?

    1. Hi Steven,

      We are still working on this project! We’re aiming to have the pre-sale start at the end of October, so keep an eye out for more updates soon.

      Thanks,
      -Steve

  2. Why don’t you put cooling fins in that giant opening? Seems like wasted space. Also how much PSI can this handle? What temperature were you testing at? Does it perform this way throughout a wide variety of temperature ranges?

    -Ted

    1. Hi Ted,

      Which opening are you referring to? If you mean directly in front of the inlet or outlet, that would be detrimental to airflow and cooling as the fins would have to be perpendicular to flow. The open area in the end-tanks also lets us design the interior of the intercooler to evenly distribute airflow across the entire core. This testing was performed at ambient shop temperature, which is about 75*F, but the flow bench calculates mass flow based on air temperature and density, so pressure drop and flow increase percentages will be the same regardless of temperature.

      I will have to talk to the engineer to get a specific PSI rating for this intercooler, but I know it is well above what any 6.7L will be making in boost pressure.

      Thanks,
      -Steve

    2. I realize that this engineered Intercooler can handle the boost, but what is important is how it flows over stock and what is it going to do for high egt’s in the 6.7 powerstroke. Can you give us some figures on the increase in flow and reduction of egt temps? Also the tubing or the plumbing would that remain in stock form?

      1. Hi Mike,

        Here’s our flow bench data for this intercooler that outlines how it flows compared to stock: Mishimoto 2011-2017 6.7L Powerstroke Flow Bench Data

        We should have another update in a few weeks with dyno results, so keep an eye out for that as well. As for the piping, this cooler is designed to fit with the stock intercooler piping; however, we currently offer a piping kit for the 2011-2016 6.7L that you can find here: Ford 6.7L Powerstroke Intercooler Pipe and Boot Kit, 2011-2016

        Thanks!
        -Steve

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *